18 April 2004
18 April 2004
Sad loss to dolphin science
Beebop was special to us. He was identifiable in a sea of dolphins that we struggle to identify. We first saw him when he was very young and we watched him grow. We couldn't help but become endeared to him. We had hopes and dreams for him and for what he could teach us about his species. We are saddened by the fact that, at the age of three, he died in the shark nets.

On Friday (2004/04/16) the Natal Sharks Board
notified us that there had been a humpback dolphin caught in the Richards Bay
shark nets. I went to see if I recognised the dolphin. The body was of a young
male and it was so fresh that rigor mortis had not yet set in. I recognized the
fin as belonging to a dolphin that was in our catalogue as #43, known to us as
Beebop. We first saw Beebop on 23 April 2001, a tiny baby alongside his mother
#6,
LineL.
We saw Beebop quite often
because
LineL is one of Richards Bay's resident dolphins (only two other mothers, Zipper
and Venus, have been seen more often than LineL). By age two, Beebop's fin was
quite identifiable with two notches and a distinctive fin shape. Most youngsters
aren't very identifiable and once they leave their mother's sides we can no
longer identify them. This is a pity because it means that we don't know what
happens to them - do they stay in the area, do they leave never to return, do
they leave but come back sometimes? Because he was distinctive, Beebop was going
to help us begin to answer these questions. The literature suggests that
humpback dolphins calve about every three years, so we were expecting LineL to
have another calf soon and we were very excited to investigate Beebop's reaction
to a new arrival. The day after Beebop died we found a group of dolphins that
included LineL and, to our surprise, a tiny new baby, probably just days old.
Usually when a new baby arrives, the older sibling is forced to leave his
mother's side. We presume that without his mother's protection and guidance,
Beebop fell victim to the shark nets.

17 January 2004
Dolphins on Tour of the Bay
Despite perfectly windless conditions, the rain on Saturday (17 January 2004)
kept us on the hard until about 11:00 when it finally let up and allowed us to
head out to look for humpback dolphins. We didn't have to go far; they were
right there in the Mzingazi Canal just east of Pelican Island.
We
followed them back, the way we'd just come, to the Zululand Yacht Club and
Mzingazi Waterfront. Once there they seemed to chase fish. After we'd spent a
little time with them we realized that it was Zipper and her calf, Pip, two
Richards Bay residents. Zipper is definitely more than 20 years old. Ben Durham
used to see her in Richards Bay in 1991 and she was already an adult because
even then she had a calf with her. We were so surprised when, right next to a
moored yacht, Free Spirit, Zipper spin-jumped out of the water.
We know that the youngsters jump, we suspected that big males may jump sometimes
too but we never expected an old lady like Zipper to jump like that!
We were very pleased to see that a crowd of people at the Yacht Club had noticed
the two dolphins and came to the edge to watch. The dolphins only stayed for a
short while before they turned around and headed up the canal again. We're
pretty excited because on the way Pip jumped and Brett took a couple of
photographs and we now have on record that he is a young male.
The two of them made a beeline for the end of the North Pier, i
nto
view of the people standing on the Dolphin Viewing Platform. Suddenly two new
dolphins came from the northeast. We instantly recognized them as Toothbrush and
Sinbad. We have photos of Toothbrush dating back to 2000 but last year s/he was
recorded quite often, frequently with Zipper and Pip. Sinbad just has two tiny
notches and isn't very distinctive, s/he is easy to miss. However, last year we
recorded his/her presence relatively frequently as well, mostly with Toothbrush,
Zipper and Pip. 
The levels of social intensity were high: Toothbrush, Sinbad and Pip circled one
another, swam up-side-down, spyhopped and jumped for half an hour just off
Richards Bay's main beach, Alkantstrand. All the while, Zipper was close to the
end of the North Pier, apparently not interested in the boisterous play.
The play turned into social-travel and the 4 dolphins headed back into the
harbour, still circling and spyhopping. They spent the next half hour feeding
intensely between Pelican Island and the T-jetty. Shoals of fish surged out the
water ahead of the dolphins. On a few occasions, we witnessed dolphins' jaws
clamping down on hapless fish, something we don't often see.
After a while, the number of dolphins around us dwindled until there were no
dolphins and so we decided to call it a day. We headed back for Mzingazi Canal
and on our way, at the tip of Naval Island, we saw the dolphins again. Again we
saw large fish jumping out ahead of the dolphins. This time it was quite plain
to see that the dolphins were herding the fish into shallow water.
This
brought them very close to the Naval Island beach and once again attracted human
attention.
They then seemed to hurry around Naval Island, on their way to the Small Craft
Harbour. They detoured briefly to meet up with another 2 residents: mother-calf
pair Ivory and Tusk. The six dolphins fed quite intensely in the Small Craft
Harbour in plain view of Naval Island's beach goers and fishermen on the
quayside. They did this for another 20 minutes or so before heading out into the
main channel, off towards the Coal Terminal. By now it was 15:00 and the wind
was really blowing, we were struggling to follow them and this forced the end of
a very productive dolphin follow that had been seen by many of Richards Bay's
human residents and visitors.


7 May 2003
Pip plays with her food
We found a
group of humpback dolphins pretty quickly in the entrance to the harbour. They
were on the northern side of the North Pier, sometimes just behind backline,
close to Alkantstrand’s surfers. The follow began very nicely with a spyhop
that continued until half the dolphin was out of the water and ended with a lazy
back-flop.
There
were just three dolphins in the group, resident Zipper and her calf, Pip, and
Toothbrush who we’ve been seeing a lot of lately. Fortunately, their behaviour
was really obvious – they were definitely feeding. They were here then there
(their dive direction was erratic) but they basically stayed in the same area.
Their surfacings were mostly independent of the other dolphins in the group and
uncoordinated and they were quite widespread, i.e. not all in a tight-knit
group. Their dives were steep and intensity levels were high, they were ver
y
obviously chasing something. After about 30 minutes, intensity levels dropped a
bit, they were no longer chasing so fiercely.


Over
the next 10 minutes we watched something rather unusual. Pip, the juvenile, was
playing with his/her food – just like a cat playing with a mouse. She’d come
to the surface with the fish in her mouth.
She tossed
the fish around and slapped it against the surface and then she’d dive, only
to surface a couple of minutes later to toss the fish around again. 
She
seemed to open her mouth wide, release the fish and then catch it again quickly.
We have seen other dolphins “playing with their food” but it was always
quite brief. Next thing, we saw Pip clamp her jaws shut a couple of times, she
gave a little flukes-up dive and that was the last we saw of them.

10 November 2000
Long distance dolphins
Friday began badly. Then it got good. Then it got better and it ended up extraordinary. The bad beginning bit was when we passed the Natal Sharks Board boat coming in - they had six dead sharks on board. This is rather a lot of dead sharks for one day.
I really wish that the Sharks Board would find another method to keep people safe from shark attack other than killing the sharks.
Soon after we left the harbour we found a trio of humpback dolphins and that is when the day got good. The trio consisted of a mother with an infant, and a sub-adult. We couldn't decide if the third was an older calf that was recently displaced by the new calf or if it was a young suitor to the mother. The mother had a very white fin, not just a white patch like White Tip's, the whole fin was very light. We think that an appropriate name for her is Ivory and her calf is to be Tusk.
Unfortunately, identifying the third one is difficult since it didn't have noticeable marks on its fin (although there was a scar far down on its back). For about 15 minutes they seem to play a bit while they travelled quite slowly in a north-easterly direction. Then they sped up and moved almost three times the distance in the next 15 minutes. Suddenly they turned and headed offshore for a while before they doubled back and went south-west. Unfortunately we lost them quite close to where we had originally found them, just 200m offshore of the shark nets.
After another short search the day got even better. We found a small group of bottlenose dolphins about a kilometre south of the
harbour.
Three adults and one large juvenile appeared to be feeding. They move so differently to humpback dolphins, so much quicker. They dart around and come much closer to our boat than humpback dolphins. After about 10 minutes one of the bigger ones came over and rode our bow a couple of times - it is so exciting when they do that! He (?) was very daring, coming up centimetres in front of the boat repeatedly for about 10 minutes.
Then he stopped interacting with us and went back to feeding. We admired them for a little while longer and then decided to search for humpback dolphins rather.
Lucky for us, about 2km south-west was group of humpies that consisted mostly of our usual suspects: White Tip and Spike, LineL and Heffalump, Venus and Fire with a couple of other not-so-easily-identified individuals. They played and socialised while making steady progress in a north-easterly direction, parallel to the coast along the 10m isobath. Suddenly they stopped and swam inverted in circles in typical greeting behaviour. The new arrivals turned out to be Ivory and Tusk. The last time we had seen them was an hour and a half before and 4 km away. They joined the travelling group which seemed to grow quite rapidly to at least 13 dolphins. An hour later we passed the harbour entrance. We were so impressed with ourselves because we managed to follow them through our "Bermuda Triangle" where we always lose them. We went more than a kilometre and a half beyond our Bermuda Triangle, which is probably a record, and then we lost them. Together we had travelled 5km in less than 2 hours in near-perfect sea conditions and it seemed impossible to lose such a large group of dolphins on such a beautifully calm day, but we did.
We looked around for a while and then headed over to the shark nets and sure enough, there were some of the dolphins feeding just 150 m from Net 5. The dolphins were quite widespread but we saw White Tip and Spike and another mother-calf pair that were quite unusual. The baby was very, very light, almost creamy rather than grey. We can't say whether it was just a very light individual, or maybe an albino. Perhaps they are born light and darken with thyme. Anyway, it's been christened Bino and it's mom is Al.
After about twenty minutes of feeding the dolphins started heading off in a north-easterly direction again. We followed White Tip and Spike travelling very quickly. They covered 1.85 km in 30 min - pretty fast for humpback dolphins. They joined the large group again amidst a lot of fuss and social interaction and then everyone started travelling again. In the big group were LineL and Heffalump, Venus and Fire, FL (who we hadn't seen earlier), Ivory and Tusk, Al and Bino and more. We suspect that one pair was Sally Slice and Squeak (one of the two brand-new-borns; see the newsletter titled "Two new peas in a pod" April 2000 www.dolphins.org.za/news.htm). They continued to follow the 10m isobath for a while and then went into water more than 15m deep before heading inshore near the Richards Bay Lighthouse. They continued to travel north-east just behind backline,
close to the breaking waves but the group was smaller, either they had split up or they were more widespread. We stayed with them for another hour before the belated wind made it difficult to follow the dolphins. And so we ended up, almost 10km north-east of the harbour after following these dolphins for more than 5 hours which is quite a good long follow. It was extraordinary however, because we had covered a distance of about 15 km with the dolphins, the longest distance ever.

One point worth noting is that the Natal Sharks Board is planning to place experimental shark nets and baited hooks near the Richards Bay Lighthouse. They want to work out how
many baited hooks they need to kill the same number of sharks that one shark net does. So they will be setting extra (experimental) shark nets (probably for 2 or 3 years) in the Richards Bay area which could result in more deaths of humpback dolphins. Although placing the experimental shark nets near the Lighthouse is better than the Sharks Board's original plan which was to set them just south of the harbour (probably the best place to find humpies in KwaZulu-Natal), it is quite possible that humpback dolphins will die in this experiment. We are also concerned that their proposed alternative to shark nets - baited hooks - still works on the principle of killing the sharks to lower the chance of shark attack. Although the baited hooks are better than shark nets because they shouldn't catch dolphins and turtles, we are disappointed that the NSB still intends killing sharks to protect bathers. Can't they use a more modern way to reduce the chance of shark attack, one that is not lethal to sharks?

07 November 2000
Walking for Wildlife
This update is to let our subscribers know about an amazing Coastal Conservation
Hiking Expedition being undertaken by three young men from the Wildlife &
Environment Society of South Africa (WESSA). Robbie Dyer, Raymond Ngubane, and
Derek Brown are planning to hike South Africa's entire coastline - that is
3300km - in seven months! They are doing this to promote coastal conservation
awareness through public participation and media coverage. As they go along the
team will also be monitoring local coastal ecological conditions and they will
conduct basic research. The result will be an awesome amount of pertinent
information on which to base Conservation Action for ecologically threatened
sections of the coast. For more information and to keep track of their progress,
please visit their impressive website: www.wildlifesociety.org.za/Hike/coastal_hike.htm.
If you would like to support them in this momentous task you can, through:
* Sponsorship
* Any kind of donation (hiking equipment, food funding)
* Becoming a member of the Wildlife & Environment Society of SA (WESSA)
* Joining them for part of their hike
* Attending their presentations at WESSA branches
* Caring for our coast!
They started their walk on 20 Oct 2000 at Kosi Bay, at the SA/Mozambique border
and have spent the past two weeks walking along a very wild part of the
coastline in all kinds of weather. We knew that they were to arrive at Richards
Bay on Sunday 11 November. We launched our boat early on Sunday and luckily
found a group of dolphins as we left the harbour. When we found them they were
very close to the shark nets, socialising! They didn't stay there for very long
and we followed them social-travelling across the harbour entrance. In the group
were a few familiar dolphins: White Tip and Spike and LineL and Heffalump and
there were a few unfamiliar dolphins. It looked like Spike and Heffalump were
having great fun off to one side by themselves, chasing each other, jumping and
somersaulting.
Unfortunately,
we
had to leave the two young ones because a big ship was leaving the harbour and
we had to get out its way. We caught up with the adults over at the south
breakwater. After a short while their behaviour had changed from social travel
to fast travel and we could only see 2 mother-calf pairs. hat a pity the wind
picked up and made it difficult to follow them because soon they were out of
sight.
Check
out one of Spike's cool jumps!
Once we had lost the dolphins we decided to quickly (!) ride up the coast to try
to spot the Wildlife Walkers because we wanted to give everyone an update as to
where exactly they were. Friday's edition of the Zululand Observer had invited
the community to join the hikers at Five-mile Beach. We went all the way to
Nhlabane Estuary without spotting them. Eventually we turned around and headed
back (quickly!). We finally found them a little south of Five Mile beach,
walking along the beach with a small group.
After we had moored our boat we hurried up the beach to meet them. When we
reached them everyone was staring out to sea. They were watching a crocodile! In
the surf! At first i thought it was just a log but it was definitely a croc. It
disappeared after a while and the group continued walking.
The Wildlife Walkers arrived at Alkantstrand to the applause of everyone on the
beach. Dave Savides of the Zululand Observer, representing the Richards Bay
community, welcomed them and Roy Jones of KwaZulu-Natal Nature Conservation
Services (www.rhino.org.za) congratulated and encouraged them. We of the
Endangered Wildlife Trust's Richards Bay Humpback Dolphin Project (www.dolphins.org.za)
told them that Richards Bay is a special part of our coast because it is one of
the few places on SA's east coast that the rare humpback dolphin is not so rare!
We asked them to please take with them our message that it is time for a new
method of protecting bathers, that the old-fashioned method being used at the
moment, i.e. the killing of sharks in shark nets, is a threat to our KwaZulu-Natal
coastal environment. Then, Sea Rescue (rbay.nsri.org.za) offered them its
services and let them know that they could call for help anywhere along the
coast and that Sea Rescue would be there to help them. Our Port Captain, Cpt.
Brophy offered Portnet's services in the way of a helicopter ride across the
harbour entrance.
So we waved good-bye to the three men with an immense mission as they lifted off
in Pornet's Augusta. Good luck guys in your adventure with a purpose! And Thank
You for caring about our Coast. Thank you also to our Partners in Conservation,
the Wildlife and Environment Society of South Africa and Mazda Wildlife Fund for
investing in these three conservationists and their very important assignment.
Keep the Ocean Alive!
16 September 2000
Mangrove Cleanup
International Coastal Clean-up day, Saturday 16 September 2000, was the day that all
around the world people gathered on beaches and other coastal environments to pick up
litter. Richards Bay Humpback Dolphin Project and Sea Rescue (http://rbay.nsri.org.za) got
together a tidying team of 13. We crossed the harbour in the Dolphin Research boat with
the northerly wind howling! It was perfectly sunny but it was blowing! Everyone was
soaking wet before we even got halfway across the bay. We were on our way to an area
between the Richards Bay Coal Terminal and 40/43, to a small stand of black mangrove
trees.

Black mangroves (Bruguiera gymnorrhiza) are not as common as the white mangroves [(Avicennia
marina) which grow in a variety of places in the Richards Bay harbour). What a
beautiful and mysterious place, the black mangrove forest. The tide was on its way out and
water was rushing and bubbling around the gnarled buttress-roots that keep the trees
upright. And, as usual, there were many peculiar sounds, snaps and pops, made by falling
enigmas.
We did not see much animal life this time - only a few Littorina snails that climb the
trunks of the mangroves and a modest number of crabs in the sand. Previously (perhaps on a
rising tide) we have seen many more crabs, as well as
the strangest of mangrove creatures - the mudskipper. This little fish
spends much of its time out of the water, perched on broken branches that lie across the
surface. It can use its pectoral fins as limbs to "walk" across the branches or
mud. You might wonder how a fish can breathe
air. Apparently it gulps a mouthful of water and can hold this
oxygenated water in its gill chambers allowing it to breathe in spite of being in the air.
I love to watch them bouncing along the water's surface when they're in a hurry.
We have even seen vervet monkeys in this particular mangrove forest. One day as we were
leaving the mangroves along the small waterway, as if they had been waiting for us to
leave, this troop of vervets came bounding out from further inside the forest. The
youngsters proceeded to play at the forest: water interface while the adults sat and
sunned themselves. If you would like to learn more about mangroves, i found a site worth
visiting: http://www.env.qld.gov.au/environment/coast/habitats/m.html#What
(It is written by an Australian and their common names for mangroves are different to
ours: they call our "black" mangroves, "orange" mangroves and our
"white" mangroves, "grey.")
Our team moved between the mangrove trees picking up and digging up garbage.
Mostly we collected plastic bags, plastic
sheeting and
plastic bottles as well as lots of
polystyrene. Ropes were also a problem, often restraining roots. Plastic bags posed less
of a problem to the roots and many had grown through the thin plastic. We found shoes, 5
hard hats and even a toy car. The most peculiar item we found was a rubbish bin. Each and
every item that was picked up, had to be categorised and counted and recorded on a data
sheet provided by the Center for Marine Conservation.
They are
the main organising body for the International Coastal Cleanup (what an achievement!) and
they will analyse the data collected from all around the world to draft anti pollution
legislation. Please visit their site: http://www.cmc-ocean.org/3_pt/3_ptintro.php3.
Here in KwaZulu-Natal, the KwaZulu-Natal Nature Conservation Services did all the local
organising and they deserve our thanks. Please visit their site: www.rhino.org.za. We would also like to thank Portnet for
inviting us to clean up this very special part of South Africa's coast.
All together, we picked up about 22 bags of rubbish off about a 500m2 piece of mangrove
forest in three and a half hours. This works out to one bag for every 25m2. Which is a lot
of rubbish considering that most of it was flimsy plastic bags!
The mangroves' protruding breathing roots (necessary in waterlogged, oxygen-deficient mud)
trap wind-blown litter very well. I used to think that this made it a particularly
littered environment but what i noticed this time is that the trees at the harbour's edge
had a lot of litter but they seem to act as filters and a little further into the forest
is remarkably litter-free.
By the time we had finished, the tide had turned and was on its way in again.
If you would like to see some pictures of the mangroves, please visit our site
www.dolphins.org.za and go to the "News" page.

A grateful thanks to all in our team: Bushy O'DonOvan and his sons Darren and Gavin.
Maritza and Andre Prinsloo. Steven Burgess. Quinton van Wyk. Arlin Doust and his friend
Douglas Brown. Kursten and Cameron Meyer.
22 June 2000
Black Betty
We had a most extraordinary morning yesterday. Early in the morning we got a call from
Graham Barrett to say that they had a melon-headed whale in their swimming pool! It had
stranded 60 km south of Richards Bay, at Amatikhulu (29.134S, 031.613E) on Wednesday. A
nature conservation officer, Joseph had tended to it and kept it wet until Carol Barrett
from ORI/Seaworld had rescued it on Wednesday evening. They put bags of salt into their
swimming pool and all through the night Carol and Brendon and friends looked after the
melon-headed whale (which looks more like a dolphin than a whale at 2.3m long, dark and
slender). With the aid of a life jacket, they supported the whale and walked it around and
around the swimming pool.
When we arrived, we helped
Carol and Brendon to feed it squid but it wouldn't swallow. Perhaps the rest it got while
being fed made it feel a bit better because it seemed stronger when we started to walk it
again. It was incredible to put my arms around this animal and support her, to be so
close, to talk to her. We are used to seeing dolphins at a distance or rotten in the shark
nets, not close up and intimate. I could see her blowhole tightly shut, then suddenly
opening for a breath.
Over most of her body her charcoal skin was
smooth but across her back the skin was wrinkled. White lips covered small "peg"
teeth. Her eyes were always shut. My arms quickly tired and Brett held Black Betty (as I
like to call the little whale) and walked with her. Carol walked her again and then it was
my turn again. As we changed over, Black Betty started tailslapping, convulsing and after
about 15 seconds of thrashing about, she went limp. Her eyes opened for the first time and
she died.
Looking inside her mouth, we could see that her teeth were worn suggesting that she was
quite old. According to Cockcroft's Whale Watch and Carwardine's Whales, Dolphins and
Porpoises, melon-headed whales seldom venture close to shore. They are not seen very often
but seem
to
occur in deep, warm tropical and subtropical waters. A few have been spotted in the
Mozambique Channel. One other stranding has been reported in South Africa, at Hout Bay in
the Western Cape (34.036S, 018.348E). Not very much is known about the biology of this
species.
Black Betty's body was taken to the Richards Bay Sharks Board base, thanks to Portnet for
helping by providing transport. Unfortunately, the Sharks Board freezer was broken. On Vic
Peddemors' instruction, the body was left under trees in the shade until today when Vic
collected it for dissection. We hope to read a report on what he finds.
Sunday 16/04/2000
A fourth dolphin was also swimming with them, possibly an older calf. There
was some social interaction while they travelled southward. About half an hour after we
had found these four, they joined up with another group.
This group had two or three adults with ANOTHER TINY BABY.
This new baby still had neo-natal folds
which means that it was probably only a few hours old. This baby had two adults flanking
it whereas only one adult flanked the first baby. The babies were so funny to watch they
really lacked the adult's elegance. When the adults surface it is a very smooth action -
nose, head, fin and under the water again. The babies do not judge the surface at all and
they come shooting out the
water only to
belly flop down with the grace of a turkey landing. They'll learn.
Sunday 9/04/2000
It's been raining and blowing in Zululand for ages. We've not been able to launch our boat for 11 days now. That means that we don't have very much news about the dolphins. When it rains like this, lots of people ask: Where do the dolphins go when it storms and the sea is so rough? Have you ever wondered? We don't think that they have too many options, they can't disappear under the sea - they have to come up to breathe. We think that they carry on as normal. The few times that we have been out there in bad weather we have seen them near the Richards Bay harbour. Some of the local paddleskiers have said that they also see them out and about around the harbour in spite of the weather.Sunday 12/03/2000
All about White Tip
On Friday, as we left the harbour we found a few (about five) dolphins near the shark
nets again. They were obviously feeding and we could hear lots of echolocation clicks but
just a few whistles. After about 20 minutes they split up into two groups and then they
disappeared. Within 10 minutes we found three of them again - heading into the harbour.
White Tip and Spike with a third young adult (who we believe is Junior) swam on the north
side of the dredged channel for about half an hour.
It is
not easy to record their sounds when they are travelling because we must be stationary
when we put the hydrophone in the water. Once we managed to get ahead of them and stopped
and recorded their sounds. We heard many clicks as they approached us, I would not be
surprised if a dolphin was investigating the hydrophone. When we got in line with the Coal
Terminal they crossed over the channel and headed towards the mangroves right next to Coal
Terminal. And then, can you believe it, we lost them. The water in the harbour is so flat
and following dolphins is much easier in the harbour than in the big wide ocean; still, we
lost them. Because the Coal Terminal is at a "crossroads" the dolphins could
have gone in any direction. So we spent more than hour looking around the harbour for them
but
they were nowhere to be found. The only direction that we did not search was the
way out of the harbour. We figure they must have turned around and headed out of the
harbour on the other side of the channel. By the time we had figured this out the wind had
picked up and conditions were no longer any good for finding and following dolphins. Our
bad luck aside, we consider it our good fortune every time we see White Tip and Spike.
Between Late August and early October last year, White Tip began to develop a
large lesion on her head. More and more it resembles the cancerous
"cauliflowers" that disfigured Quasimodo, the hunchback of humpbacks. Although
we used to see Quasi at least twice a month during our first year of research (1998), we
have not seen her since November 1998. Like Quasimodo, White Tip is a regular here at
Richards Bay and, probably because of her familiarity, she is one of our favourites. When
we first met her, her youngster, Junior, spent ages entertaining us. We saw the two of
them throughout the year and Junior often presented Brett and Mark with brilliant photo
opportunities. By the end of 1998, we were so proud of her independence - she spent less
time at White Tips side and was obviously fishing for herself. When we came back to
Richards Bay in 1999, White Tip had a new, tiny baby who we called Spike (for no good
reason). Unfortunately, Junior's fin had no distinct notches so now we can not be sure
whether or not it is her but we often see a small dolphin that swims with White Tip and
Spike. White Tip's lesion is not nearly as extensive as the lesions on Quasimodo's head
and body but it does se
em to be growing. We wonder if this
means that Quasimodo and White Tip are related. Nobody seems to know what this disease is.
We have corresponded with the dolphin vet from Sea World in Durban and i took pictures of
Quasimodo and White Tip to the Biennial Conference of the Biology of Marine Mammals. No
one has seen other dolphins with this disease and all the vets say that it is impossible
to diagnose without a tissue sample. Because humpback dolphins are so shy, it will not be
easy to get a sample from White Tip. Because we do not have the equipment or expertise it
will be impossible. Check out our pictures of White Tip and of Quasimodo on our
"News" page and if you have any idea about these growths may be, please let us
know.
Tuesday 7/03/2000
Sorry there have been no updates for a while. I have not been able to bring myself to
write about the dolphin that died in the shark nets at the beginning of February. It was
horrible. This dolphin was another large male, 2.7 m long. His fin was quite distinctive,
very hooked with some prominent notches (but we have not found him in our catalogue).
He was caught just 15 m away from a pinger that was still
working. Recently we have often found dolphins near the nets. They seem to be ignoring the
pingers, often they are less than 50 m from the nets and we've seen them swimming right
over the nets twice. We know that the pingers are working because we've been monitoring
them with our new hydrophone. We are able to hear the pinger signals 500 m away.
Obviously, the hearing capabilities of the dolphins are different to ours, so, just
because we can hear the pingers at that distance does not necessarily mean that the
dolphins can hear them. However, since many of the dolphins' whistles are around 10 kHz
(which is the frequency of the pinger signals) it is safe to assume that the dolphins can
hear the pingers. The fact that we can hear the pingers so far away means that the
dolphins have a very good chance of hearing them close by. And, since they still spend so
much time close to the shark nets, it seems possible that they are not heeding the warning
signal of the pingers or recognising them as warning signals. Although this is the third
death since the pingers went into the shark nets in July 1999, it is still too soon to say
that they don't work. We use the average rate of humpback dolphin deaths in the Richards
Bay shark nets before the pingers were deployed as a reference point. This rate is quite
variable but the average is approximately one humpback dolphin every three months. The NSB
says that they did not expect the pingers to reduce the mortality rate to zero and to work
out exactly how effective the pingers are will take a few years. And, as Brett pointed
out, perhaps if the pingers had not been in, ten dolphins might have died. So, as the
cliché maintains, only time will tell.
We rounded the North Pier at 6 am and did our usual once-round-the nets, then we headed south. We weren't even one-and-a-half km south of the South Pier when we spotted two humpback dolphins. It was a mother-juvenile pair and they were travelling south, close to the shore (<500m). At one stage the female stopped and chased some fish near the surface, we could see her closing her jaws on some small (+ 10 cm) fish. It was just a brief stop and then they carried on travelling. After about 25 minutes we left these two dolphins and headed over to other dolphins we'd spotted nearby but we didn't find them. We headed back to where we had left the first two and found a group of moms and young ones that were playing and jumping and chasing. There were at least eight of them, probably more.
White Tip and Spike were part of this group. White Tip had a funny growth on her head. It was about 15 cm in diameter and was a brownish-red colour. At first we thought that the growth was the same as Quasimodo's but it was quite a different colour (Quasi's growth's were whitish pink), also it seemed to stand quite high off her head. We'll have to wait and see if Brett got a picture of it. The last time we saw her (27 August) she looked perfectly normal.
As usual, White Tip and Spike didn't stay with the main group for long and we didn't see much of her after the first 10 mins. Also there was Getippie (or a younger version of Getippie) who has a funny piece of skin (?) hanging off the tip of his/her fin. We saw him/her on Tuesday briefly. He/she was with her mom who has a V-shaped notch near the apex of her fin on the trailing edge. We have called her Venus. After 25 minutes, the size of the group increased and LineL arrived, haven't seen him (or her?) for a while.
We watched these dolphins playing for almost an hour. Then at least two new dolphins joined the group. They were quite big and quite scarred, we think they were males. One had a huge hump and a very distinct fin that looked a lot like a periscope (so we've called him Perry). The arrival of these two changed the whole mood of the group - they stopped playing - no more jumps and spyhops, no more chasing. They were suddenly much more sedate. Any one with any ideas about why the change in behaviour occurred when these males arrived, please write to shanan@dolphins.org.za. We couldn't stay for much longer so we dont know what happened next.
We started our second search at about 10am. We joined Sea Rescue in tending the paddleski race that happens at this time of the year every year. It's called the Mouth-to-mouth because it goes from the Mhlatuze River Mouth (Richards Bay) to the Mlalazi River Mouth (Mtunzini) which is 39 km. It goes through prime humpback dolphin country and on three occasions we spotted humpback dolphins. The first pair was White Tip and Spike and they were in more or less the same area that we had seen them earlier. Two and a half hours later, we were twenty km south of Richards Bay and we saw a lone humpback dolphin. Fifteen minutes after that we saw a mother-juvenile pair. Crew on Sea Rescue's Lifeboat saw a group of about 9 dolphins during their travels and crew on Sea Rescue's 7.5 rubber duck saw dolphins at the entrance to the Richards Bay harbour when they came back. We've now decided to go all the way to Mtunzini on a research mission to see whom we can see. We've just got to hold our thumbs for better weather than we've been having lately.
Please give us a couple of days to get the pictures developed and scanned and then visit the website.
23/09/1999 Thursday
For a while we have been wanting to explore a little further afield than normal; our
study area is so small (only 15 km long). We decided to try to get to St Lucia (about 60
km by sea) and to check if we could find and id humpback dolphins along the way. On
Thursday we had our first reasonable day in what seems like weeks so we launched the boat
and headed northeast. We saw a couple of flying fish along the way but not much else.
About two hours after setting off we passed the Nhlabane estuary which was open. Soon
after that we rounded a corner, then the wind picked up. This means that the swell size
increases and white horses spoil your chance of seeing dolphins. We could see Dawson's
Rocks and we knew we were just a couple of kilometres short of halfway. We decided to get
to the halfway mark before turning back to Richards Bay.
Just then Brett spotted a group of whales and some bottlenose
dolphins (that soon disappeared). Five humpback whales interacted with one another,
sometimes the interactions seemed to be friendly but other times they seemed quite
aggressive. There was lots of physical contact between them. They travelled slowly
southwest, spending lots of time at the surface in quite a tight group. There were two
mothers with juveniles at their sides.
We couldn't say if the fifth one was male or female, adult or young. It was
quite strange, every now and then we heard a whale trumpet just like an elephant. We wish
our hydrophone would hurry up and arrive so we can hear their underwater sounds.
We spent almost two hours following them along the coastline, usually within 2 km from the shore.
On two other occasions
during the follow, bottlenose dolphins appeared for a short while before disappearing.
About 13 km from where we found them they changed course and started heading due south.
Their behaviour also changed and they didn't spend as much time at the surface. This made
them more difficult to follow, and we weren't going in the right direction anymore. So we
headed back home. Next good dolphin research day we have, we'll try again to get to St
Lucia.
10 September 1999 Dolphin Carousel: Humpback Dolphins seen feeding co-operatively In June (13/06/99) we watched some humpback dolphins feed co-operatively in the harbour mouth.
There was a large school of fish (they covered an area of about
100 m2, we don't know how deep they went). Nearby we found a much smaller
school (+/- 10 m2) of the same kind of fish (tentatively identified as
broad-headed mullet) that appeared to have been pinched off from the larger group by the
dolphins. These fish were swirling around in a tight circle, apparently trapped by the
dolphins. This has been called a "carousel" by other dolphin researchers. The
fish went round and round and would suddenly start shivering and almost rising out of the
watersometimes even jumping clear out of the water. They seemed to anticipate the arrival
of the dolphin, perhaps the dolphins were using sonar bursts to confuse the fish?

When this happened we invariably saw a dolphin dash through the centre of the school. They went through one at a time, each waiting his/her turn.
They hardly ever surfaced while in the circle though sometimes a dorsal fin would break
the surface. Sometimes a dolphin would dash through upside-down with its white belly
visible to us at the surface. Occasionally a dolphin would flick fish out of the water.
The juveniles seemed to stay on the side whilst their mothers went through though some
followed their moms through the circle.

When we first found the carousel there were just a few dolphins but soon there were at least 15 of them. White Tip and Spike were there and so were Hope and her baby, in fact there were quite a few mother-offspring pairs.
Nicodemus was alsothere; he
had fresh wounds behind his hump. After an hour the group started getting smaller again.
Hope and her baby stayed on after most of the other dolphins left.
Friday 27/08/1999
Our "day-at-work" started at 06:15 when we loaded up the boat and put it in
the water. We called Port Control for permission to leave the harbour at about 06:45 and
then did quick "once around the nets." We headed south and, at 07:45, Brett
spotted some dolphins. There were about 7 of them and they were travelling slowly towards
the harbour. Most of the dolphins were not identifiable from the boat, we think they were
quite young.
There were two dolphins
though that were very scarred, we think that they were big old males. Nicodemus we have
seen before (he was part of the group that were feeding co-operatively, see 13/06/99), he
has a prominent v-shaped nick on trailing edge of his fin with lots of scars on the fin.
The funny thing is that the top half of the fin seems to be bent towards the left. The
other big old dolphin had lots of old scars and fresh wounds. He was so big and ugly we
called him Jabba.
After
we'd followed them for an hour and 10 mins, White Tip and Spike joined the group, though
by this time we hadn't seen Jabba for a while. After we'd been following these dolphins
for two hours they finally reached the south breakwater - travel really was slow - it took
them 2 hours to travel less than 4 km.
We lost them for about 10 min before Brett spotted them going back the way they had
come. This time they travelled much faster, it took them half the time to retrace their
"steps" to the place where we first found them. They had come back to join a
large group of socialising dolphins. There were lots of corkscrew interactions (the
dolphins twist around each other in the water), spyhops (the dolphins rise vertically out
of the water) and circling.
Also
there were lots of jumps and dolphins swimming upside-down just under the water's surface.
These types of behaviours are usually associated with sexual behaviour and it went on for
hours (3.75 hours to be exact)! Jabba and Nicodemus were here (they had obviously turned
back much earlier than the group we'd followed) with at least seven or eight other
dolphins. Three of these were identifiable: "Dot" had a dot on the lower part of
the fin; "Getippie" had a loose bit of skin (?) on the tip of its fin; and
"Beachcomber" had a fin that looked somewhat like a comb. White Tip and Spike
were still around and there were other mother-offspring pairs. Everyone was playing and
jumping and spinning and chasing. Watching all of this was fantastic, especially because
they were not at all bothered by us and often came quite close to the boat. Just before
15:00 they started travelling toward the harbour again but this time the whole group
travelled. They still played a bit along the way. This time they rounded the south
breakwater and entered the harbour. They travelled quite leisurely for about an hour and
then
.the Tugboat hooted at us and the tugmaster yelled at us that they were
expecting a ship, we must get out of the way. The ship was miles away! We had to wait on
the one side of the channel for 15 minutes while the ship came in -it really was far away!
In the meantime the dolphins were on the other side of the channel near the entrance to
the Small Craft harbour after a short while we couldn't see them anymore.
Soon
after the ship passed we took one minute to cross the channel. We found them not far away;
they had spilt up into smaller groups and were widespread, feeding quite intensely. We
managed to stay with them for another 45 minutes before they gradually moved out of sight
just before the sun went down.
From start to finish we logged 9 and-a-half hours of observation and collected 104 data points - our record! Brett took eight spools which works out to 288 photos. All of this and we did not even use 25 litres of fuel.